Bring Your Architecture to Life (2010.Physics Toolbox Invention Contest (2012.03).Create a Poster for any Blockbuster Movie (2014.03).Let's Battle - Battle Animation Contest (2014.06).Game Character Animation Contest (2015.04).Showcase Your Armor Knight Competition (2019.09).iClone Lip Sync Animation Contest (2021.07).Thinking if we figure out what fixes that rubix cube's accuracy, this knowledge would narrow the rendering accuracy gap! Do you know why this is, is it the subsurface scattering which you were referring to? Maybe that material was not really PBR-compatible somehow or something like that? Whatever it is that iClone 7 did to that rubix cube in the image, it does not look accurate to the scene.

It uses the video card in your computer to render photorealistic. My brain can approximate weight and texture just by looking at all the objects except for the rubix cube. Octane Render is the worlds fastest unbiased, physically based GPU renderer. What occurred here, why are these different. What am I seeing here, I can't really articulate it other than to say it is missing gloss (metallic/roughness) and thus not consistent with the rest of the rendered objects, but then the stone behind it has no gloss but looks more photo-real. Today I just buy 2 of GTX 1080 and I plan to sell my 2 of GTX 970 so I make appointments with buyers. This is cause of Octane render version if you are using octane 3.07 you will have this problem., you should upgrade it to octane 4.0 because your Video Card newer than octane version. I have 2 GTX 970 and need to upgrade to for speed up my present rendering jobs with deadline. AHHH!! Look at the rubix cube in your image, it looks flat, toonish. Hi Nvidia, I’m motion graphic designer, my primary machine is Nvidia GPU and Octane Render. iClone did it in 1.5 seconds at 4k full quality. Cheers, Stuckon3d PS: example: render a similar image in octane, and tell me how long it took. You can do amazing things in iclone 7, certainly pushing photoreal or stylized photoreal. Bottom line, it depends on the project you have in mind. 2) What is your goal? true photorealism or stylized look? 3) when it comes to skin iclone is missing subsurface, there are trick you can use to simulate this but you really need to customize it to the lighting conditions in the scene, while octane will do this automatically. Obviously speed goes to iclone, while render accuracy goes to octane. I believe that to make it a fair fight you need several things: 1) Learn both packages well first.

Octane render forum